Today, when law enforcement finds a “manifesto” explaining the details of why and how an act of violence has occurred or will be occurring, it becomes a valuable, integral part of an investigation. These manifestos have been treasure troves of information, perhaps giving a deep look into the why the suspect committed the act of violence. Manifestos are so valuable, they have been the center of many lawsuits to prevent their contents from becoming public.
So why has the Muslim Brotherhoods “manifesto” been ignored and put on a back burner? Is it because there are no outward statements of violence? In the case of “An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America” ( the Brotherhoods manifesto, first several pages are in Arabic, English follows)) there is no violence but rather a systematic, methodical outline of organizations and groups and how they will come from within to destroy America. Why would law enforcement ignore this valuable document? It even was admitted into evidence in the Holy Land Foundation Trial held in Dallas Texas in 2008.
Today, as we witness the outward aggressive progression of Muslims that have taken over many American cities, the question that begs to be answered is why the US Government is not doing anything about this. Except for Texas, where yesterday Gov Abbott proclaimed the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR (Council on American Islamic Relations) to be terrorist organizations. CAIR, doing what it does best immediately issued a statement followed by threats of lawsuits against the state of Texas and its Gov Greg Abbott. A proclamation signed by Abbott claims that CAIR “is an Islamist organization that, according to the Federal Bureau of Investigations, was founded as a ‘front group’ for ‘Hamas and its support network’ in the United States.” It’s founder and current executive director Nihad Awad has admitted he is a supporter of Hamas.
I’m a supporter of the Hamas movement” Nihad Awad Executive Director of CAIR
Abbott has been the first Governor in the United States to take such action, but whether it has teeth or not will be seen in the future. Governors in every state should immediately follow Abbotts decision to do this, despite all the accusations of being Islamophobic. Whether or not the courts will reject this doesn’t matter… forcing CAIR to put money out to battle lawsuits would be detrimental to their finances for sure. It would also cause Muslim Brotherhood front groups to be exposed as to their intent to destroy America from within.
In order to be effective, politicians must first have a spine and not fear being called Islamophobes, bigots or haters. They must take into account the validity of their manifesto and understand the intentions of Muslims in todays America. We either will remain a democracy that embraces its Christian -Judeo principals or be turned into a land under sharia law.
I urge every American citizen that understands this legitimate threat to contact their state representatives and encourage them to take a stand against the Islamization of our cities. It no longer is something to be placed on a back burner, our country’s future is at stake.
But instead many have embraced, supported and accepted their warnings under the guise of religion.
Now as we watch the UK fall to its knees, we must either acknowledge their deceit or prepare to accept their way of life. What will it be America?
Undoubtedly, we will be labeled Islamophobes, haters and bigots but just like the democrats who are now showing us their communist colors, Islamists are no longer hiding their destructive agenda.
As we have witnessed terrorist organizations publicly attack American icons and desecrate our flag, we stand silent. Why?
Now, let me introduce you to another organization coming out of the dark here in the United States. Cage International. Cage is an anti Jewish, anti- American Islamist advocacy group that appears as a human rights group on behalf of known Al Qaida and convicted terrorists. Once again, many will see this as helping Muslims who have been unfairly treated in America. What needs to be known is Cage wants to see dangerous terrorists released from prisons. One such person is Al- Qaida operative Aafia Siddiqui, a Pakistani scientist convicted and sentenced for attempting to kill US soldiers in Afghanistan. Siddiqui was sentenced to 86 years, which CAGE now claims the nine allegations she was convicted of were “lies and inconsistencies”.
The biggest voice for Cage here in the United States is Omar Sulieman, founder and president of the Yaqeen Institute in Irving TX and also an adjunct professor at the Southern Methodist University. Sulieman is a strong supporter of the BDS movement, as well as CAIR (Council on American Islamic Relations AKA Hamas) and AMP (American Muslims for Palestine). He believes the war on terror equates with a war on Muslims, a popular belief by Muslims in the United States, as they continually portray themselves as victims.
Because Suliman is considered by many as a pious Islamic preacher, his relationships with Christian preachers will be used to further this cause. What religious leaders here in the United States need to understand is embracing those advocating for the release of convicted terrorists that have killed Americans, or attempted to, were tried and convicted by our criminal justice system and must not be released under the false guise of “Muslim persecution”, or Islamophobia.
Leaders of Cage International promote jihadi and terrorist ideology, using the victim card as the chance to see violent Islamic terrorists in the UK and the US be released from prisons under humanitarian and social justice rights.
It is only a matter of time, all the Islamic organizations here within the United States ban together and declare the call to jihad. It’s happening in the UK, and it is not far behind for us.
The panel of speakers, hosted by Nashville Jewish community suggested you are a white supremacist if you oppose illegal immigration, BLM and Antifa violence, support the idea that all lives matter, and/or support former Pres. Donald Trump.
Spitalnick’s allegedly “non-partisan” group IFA, is backing a lawsuit that uses conspiracy theory law to sue individuals described as white supremacists, neo-Nazi anti-Semites and members of hate groups” involved in the Charlottesville “Unite the Right” 2017 rally. The lawsuit intends to shut down and deter hate group activity by “dismantling and bankrupting these groups and their leaders.”
Assuming the lawsuit results in monetary judgments, Spitalnick says they will destroy these people financially and “for the rest of our defendants lives we will be following them around to collect [the judgements]” by putting liens on their homes, garnishing their wages and seizing any other assets they own, as a way of deterring future white supremacy driven violence.
Throughout her presentation, Spitalnick, a former advisor and spokesperson for NYC Mayor bill deBlasio, draws parallels between Charlottesville’s lawsuit defendants and the “insurrectionists” at the Capitol riot on January 6th. She explains that white supremacy, anti-Semitism and racism, emanate from what she calls White Replacement Ideology – the fear by the white supremacist that their dominance will be replaced by minority groupsin the U.S. isbeing threatened. Spitalnick considers white supremacy to be a problem of crisis proportions,endemic to the mainstream right which uses “far right social media site Gab,” to communicate.
Spitalnick lists “horrific attacks” including the shootings at Poway synagogue in San Diego, the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh and the mosque shooting in New Zealand, as examples of the violence she attributes to “white race replacement ideology” beginning at minute 37:00:
“our fates are so intrinsically intertwined here in that you can’t take on white supremacy without taking on islamophobia. You can’t take on white supremacy without taking on anti-semitism. You can’t take on racism without taking on any of these other forms of hate.And I mentioned earlier [white] replacement theory which is the ideology that motivates so much of this extremism that we’ve seen.This is something that percolates to the surface when you see horrific attacks like the ones I mentioned.It sort of manifests in this very explicit form where you hear them chanting things like Jews will not replace us. This is the idea that jews are the puppet masters orchestrating the replacement of the white race, supporting Muslim Americans, supporting Black Americans and the Latinx community and the LGBTQ community and immigrants and refugees and anyone who doesn’t fit into the vile narrow vision for what these white supremacists want this country to be. So you see it in these very explicit and egregious terms when it happens in the form of those attacks but this is also an ideology that we see manifesting increasingly in the mainstream of the right in a variety of ways and so when you hear dog whistles like George Soros supporting the Black Lives Matter protests or supporting a caravan coming up through Central America or any of the other dog whistles that we hear from increasingly mainstream republicans and other leaders that is the same white supremacist ideology that ultimately culminates in the sorts of egregious violent attacks we’re talking about here.”
Spitalnick says this is a CRISIS! But it’s one that she claims the lawsuit can address, stopping hate and violence, without doing harm to Constitutionally protected speech. In reality, the First Amendment damage and censorship will be accomplished using strategies discussed in another virtual meeting discussed below which include financial bludgeoning, leaning on social media sites to continue de-platforming efforts and going after web hosting and domain registration companies to shut down sites groups on the left don’t like.
In other words, organized censorship.
IFA is reported to have raised over $10 million dollars to support the lawsuit which Spitalnick has said is “critical, especially because the government during the Trump administration has rolled back efforts to track and prevent white supremacist violence.” She states, “The infrastructure that’s meant to address this sort of thing has actively been dismantled.”
These organizations actively work to censor dissenting voices. They are expanding this mission by using a broadbrushed label of white supremacist to effectively erase any and all opposition to their agenda.
When asked why certain groups like the Proud Boys and QAnon adherents were drawn to the January 6th Capitol event, the ADL’s director of its Center on Extremism said these groups see themselves as fighting against liberal forces “that seek their demise and threaten their existence” and that they “perceive Donald Trump as the embodiment of their savior, basically the warrior who’s going to help protect their future and their values.”
As to Christian groups? They peddle fear of the “End Times” and the end of western white Christian society.
Eric Ward from the SPLC claimed that their driving narrative was the stolen election.He believes that the protesting groups wanted our system of democracy overthrown and an authoritarian ruler (his reference to Trump), installed in its place.
Spitalnick reiterates her script about white supremacy and violent extremism and that there “is a direct line that runs from Charlottesville through these other attacks to January 6th.” While she did not deny the hate, racism and anti-Semitism on the left, she was adamant that there is “no equivalency” between the far-right and the far-left extremists.
She believes that the CRISIS and greatest threat to our country is the far-right extremism.The people who caused what she and leftists have labeled an “insurrection” came from the right and is in the mainstream right. Her “evidence” is a far left news report that members of the GOP caucus gave a standing ovation to Majorie Taylor Greene. In typical leftist fashion, Spitalnick deliberately omits, that as reported, the standing ovation by some members of the caucus came after Greene apologized for embracing the QAnon conspiracy theory and some of her other controversial remarks.
This group took more time to focus on the “weaponization of technology” that is, the role of social media enabling hate groups to indoctrinate and recruit adherents and spread their hate speech. Spitalnick has signaled repeatedly that social media is necessarily implicated in the IFA lawsuit and greater repression of speech on these platforms will be sought under the guise of accountability for enabling the spread of disinformation and enabling the spread of extremist violence.
Along with leaning on social media sites to de-platform groups and individuals they consider sources of hate, they discussed going after web hosting and domain registration companies to shut down the sites that those on the left don’t like.
Typical deception by leftists on the Nashville panel and more
While peddling the CRISIS theme and talk of right wing extremist hate and violence, the Nashville panelists blatantly ignore the hate, violence and wanton destruction on the left. Given that they were sponsored by virtually every Jewish group and congregation in Nashville, they hypocritically ignored the virulent anti-Semitism on the left from BLM, AMAC and the co-director of the Highlander Center who is also a leader in the Movement 4 Black Lives.
Sabina Mohyuddin, AMAC’s executive director and founding member, is a stunning example of leftist duplicity.She claims that Muslims in America have been the real victims of 9-11 who have had to “endure” the hatred of white supremacy-driven Islamophobia (whichshe labels anti-Muslim racism) for years.
Using the socialist “intersectionality theory of connecting groups in a common struggle, Mohyuddin says she can’t complain about Islamophobia unless she also speaks out “forcefully” against anti-Semitism and anti-black racism.Struggle is a word she would know well as it is the definition of jihad in Arabic.
Mohyuddin’s organization, AMAC, had already signed onto “intersectionality” but made sure to conceal its anti-Semitism under the cover of anti-Zionism. In 2016, AMAC hosted an event with Linda Sarsour was the featured speaker.Sarsour is among the country’s most vocal anti-Semites who refuses to say that Israel has a right to exist. She is also a leading proponent of the anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment & Sanction (BDS) movement, otherwise known as the new anti-Semitism because it is a driver of hatred and violence against Jews.
In 2018, AMAC sponsored a program titled “Linking Liberation Struggles” featuring their own vocal anti-Semite founder and board member, Drost Kokoye, and active BDS promoter, Highlander Center co-director, Ash-Lee Henderson. And for years, AMAC board members and leaders have had a close relationship with super Jew-hater Ilhan Omar.
After slandering members of the Nashville community who write and speak about Political Islam, (basically the way political scientists objectively analyze how factors such as certain institutions and practices affect public life), Mohyuddin says she is anxious to go after “the players” she identified.
Amy Spitalnick began her tour of Nashville’s Trump-hating leftists with Samar Ali’s Millions of Conversations which ironically includes a pledge to listen to others with differing opinions. Spitalnick’s “Hate and Extremism” event with Samar Ali was billed as a way to move to a more “united America.” This is the same Samar Ali who helped get a Metro council candidate elected despite her public embrace of anti-Semites.
Her IFA-backed lawsuit is scheduled for a three week trial in beginning in October 2021.
The take-way . . .
So according to IFA and its supporters, you’re a white supremacist Islamophobe if you oppose illegal immigration or BLM rioters who attack street-side diners, or believe that all lives matter or that it’s a problem when Antifa mobsters burn down cities and physically attack police and bystanders. And you’re definitely a white supremacist, no matter what your color, if you voted for Trump.
Sponsors of the this event are listed in the even flyer. The director of the Nashville Jewish Federation, Eric Stillman can be reached at eric@jewishnashville.org
As in suspected Islamophobic or Anti-Semitic hate crimes? According to Tennessee’s Attorney General, yes.
It started with a 2013 event in Manchester, Tennessee, sponsored by the TN American Muslim Advisory Council (AMAC) called “Understanding the American Muslim Community.”
Shortly before the event, Obama-appointed U.S. Attorney Bill Killian was quoted – “We need to educate people about Muslims and their civil rights, and as long as we’re here, they’re going to be protected,” U.S. attorney Bill Killian told the Tullahoma News last week. “This is also to inform the public about what federal laws are in effect and what the consequences are.”
“Hateful statements directed at another will be used as evidence in a hate crime…”
It’s a back door way to punish what groups like the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and CAIR (Council on American Islamic Relations), subjectively label hate speech.
CAIR, a creation of the Muslim Brotherhood and which serves as a front organization for HAMAS, has helped fuel an industry of censoring protected First Amendment speech using subjectively defined “Islamophobia.”
And there was AMAC in 2013, pushing CAIR’s agenda with the help of the DOJ.
A 2019 Tennessee Attorney General Opinion in connection with the year’s HB600/SB1250, a bill based on Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, requiring colleges to use a specific definition of anti-Semitism, agrees with what the U.S. Attorney said in connection with the 2013 AMAC event in Manchester:
But the Supreme Court has also recognized that protected expression may be relevant evidence in evaluating whether an individual has engaged in prohibited conduct. In Wisconsin v. Mitchell, for example, a unanimous Court made clear that the “First Amendment . . . does not prohibit the evidentiary use of speech to establish the elements of a crime or to prove motive or intent.” 508 U.S. 476, 489 (1993); see also R.A.V., 505 U.S. at 389 (noting that some speech “can be swept up incidentally within the reach of a statute directed at conduct rather than speech”). Similarly, courts have repeatedly recognized that state officials are permitted to examine protected expression when enforcing Title VI and other anti-discrimination laws and policies, particularly for the purpose of evaluating motive or intent.
Title VI is part of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which prohibits discrimination based on race, color or national origin in programs or actives which receive federal financial assistance.
Islamists in Tennessee have long been seeking avenues to codify the myth of Islamophobia in Tennessee law and this bill may well serve their purpose.
They tried it in 2018, when an earlier version of HB600/SB1250 was pending but was ultimately never passed. During that legislative session, Islamist activists, some associated with AMAC, met with Speaker Beth Harwell and told her “that they want a bill that would protect students who are bullied because of their religion. Islamist activists in Tennessee connect bullying in school to Islamophobia which they claim leads to being regularly victimized or bullied because of their religion.”
Fast forward to the 2020 Tennessee state legislature is in session and the same scenario is being played out.
Don’t be surprised when Islamists tell legislators supporting HB600/SB1250, that what’s good for the goose is good for the gander. Are your legislators paying attention?
See how cowed the press is? So afraid of offending Islamists that they don’t even bother to tell you about what should be real concerns about the iERA organization which is the creator and sponsor of the traveling Jesus Exhibition.
Actually, the press, especially in Nashville, has forever been nothing more than an apologist propaganda machine for Islamists.
ICT’s imam, Anwar Arafat works with the UK-based iERA to fight Islamophobia. He is the imam promoting the iERA and its work, first in Memphis and now in Nashville.
ICT Imam Anwar Arafat
And as expected, neither Arafat, leaders of the ICT or the Islamist apologist Tennessean paper have disclosed any of the controversy surrounding iERA due to actions and statements made by the organization and some of its representatives.
Among other things, iERA has been banned from University College London due to having attempted to establish gender segregated seating during iERA events. The Daily Telegraph wrote that the iERA was being investigated by the Charity Commission: “amid allegations that its leaders promote anti-Semitism and have called for homosexuals and female adulterers to be stoned to death”.
Bilal Philips is discussed extensively in the report and noted as having an advisory relationship with iERA. Philips is a Canadian Muslim teacher, speaker, and author who currently lives in Qatar, having “converted to Islam in the early seventies after journeying politically and intellectually from Christianity to Communism.”
He disputes many of the claims made about him in the report including being denied entry into certain countries. In 2014, it was reported in connection with his deportation from the Philippines, that he “has been barred from entering Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States, Kenya and as of June, Bangladesh. Germany expelled Philips in 2011 after officials there claimed he advocated killing homosexuals. His books, some of which have been banned in countries such as the Czech Republic, advocate against Western dress and music.”
This just goes to show how much more tolerant we are in Tennessee because absolutely nothing happened to Awadh Binhazim who during his tenure as the volunteer Muslim chaplain at Vanderbilt, told a student gathering that Islamic law mandates capital punishment for homosexuality. When he was asked whether he accepted or rejected the Islamic punishment for homosexuality, Binhazim also confirmed, that “as a Muslim he does not have a choice of whether to accept or reject what Islam teaches.”
Binhazim was first very involved with the Islamic Center of Nashville, serving on its shura board (a consultative body which implements Sharia law), but moved on to co-found the ICT to help ring the city with mosques. Binhazim is aggressive in Islamic dawa (prosletizing), promoting Shariah as an immutable and politically dominant way of life, and freely associates with Muslim Brotherhood organizations.
And dawa – getting the poorly informed interested in considering becoming a Muslim, is what the iERA exhibit is really about. The typical and quite frankly, worn-out and unsubstantiated claim of Islamophobia is used as the justification for the amped up dawa in Middle Tennessee.
And no space is spared – how about the Southern Festival of Books???? Free Korans and as much dawa as you want to go with it compliments of the ICT.
Before taking up his position with the ICT, Imam Anwar Arafat was the imam at the sizable mosque Masjid Ar-Rohman in Memphis. Before that, he was an imam in Utah. His bio says he “has studied in Gaza, Palestine, Kuwait, and the United States.”
Arafat actually spent his teen years in Gaza where he attended Al Karmel high school which maintains an “interesting” facebook page with lots of “interesting” pictures like these:
Of course, having your picture taken with the Yasser Arafat, leader of the terrorist Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) and referred to in some circles as the “father of modern terrorism,” must have been thrilling for the young Anwar who posted this picture of the two of them:
The Gaza strip where young Anwar received a complete education, is controlled by HAMAS, a U.S. designated terrorist organization – just where you send a kid from Utah.
The all grown-up Arafat is the typical Islamist activist. For example, like many of the community Islamist agitators we have in Tennessee, he served as president the MSA at the University of Utah. He was also a cofounder of the Muslim Community Center of Utah.
In 2015, he hosted a Memphis AMAC (American Muslim Advisory Council) fundraiser with Samar Ali and Paul Galloway (a former CAIR leader working for AMAC in Tennessee).
In May 2019, Arafat was the guest speaker at former Mayor David Briley’s Muslim Community Recognition Day to pitch elevating work with AMAC as a way to address the scourge of Islamophobia. The following week Arafat started as the new imam at the ICT.
ICT makes “interesting” picks for their imams, several of which have trended toward the Jew-hating type.
Abdullah Al Ansari – “He [Allah] told us to fight the Jews and Christians. Fight them until they give jizya. They give this protective tax from their hands and they are humiliated and subdued. If Islam, true Islam and true Muslims do not rule there will never be justice.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fixcwOGaco8 (at 5:12 and almost word for word Koran 9:29; Reliance of the Traveller o9.8 – Objectives of Jihad p.602).
In 2017, ICT’s imam AhmedulHadi Sharif was preaching about the “enemies of Allah” as he referred to Jews in Israel.
It will be interesting to hear what Arafat adds to the ICT fabric given his own indoctrination during his time in anti-Jew strongholds.
Muslims across America are demanding Islamophobia be stopped
by creating a false rise in what they consider anti-Muslim rhetoric. Islamophobia is a word manufactured by the
Muslim Brotherhood in an effort to invent a false sense of victimhood.
Islamophobia is defined by Muslims as those who hold an irrational fear of
Islam, and is seen as a mental deficiency.
The word itself means a fear of Islam, but the word has
morphed into meaning a hatred of Muslims, racism, or bigotry. It encompasses
negative words that cause discomfort and embarrassment, thereby causing people
to think twice about speaking negatively about Islam and Muslims. Being labelled a hater or racist (which Islam
is not a race) can get you fired, lose family and friends, or lose
business. All fears of the American
people.
Islamic organizations like the Council on American Islamic
Relations (CAIR) have created a sense of urgency in hopes the government will
step in by criminalizing what they consider hate speech. Incidents have been
fabricated to make it appear there is a spike in anti-Muslim sentiment which in
turn they say promotes violence, vandalism and hate.
Aside from the fear of being labeled an islamophobe, people
are shying away from anything that may be construed as islamophobic and instead
flooding to hear Muslims preach about Islam, its peaceful and loving nature,
its tolerance of all things sinful, and how compatible sharia law is to the
constitution (all untrue)
HOWEVER, the most important point is not about Islamophobia
but rather how it is being used by Muslims. Their efforts to end Islamophobia
have instead created a national security risk.
Law enforcement and our military have become so delicate to
Muslim communities for fear of losing federal funding or their pensions they
are cooperating with Muslim communities conducting business in a way that
doesn’t offend the Muslims. Because of the demands by Muslims to further their
agenda and our political correctness, some of the outcomes of these
implications are:
The purging of relevant, factual training that includes who
terrorist organizations and their supporters are within the US
The termination of surveillance in mosques
The end of profiling
The ceasing of
standard search procedures, such as canines to detect explosives
The barring of our military being able to identify the enemy
and annihilate them
The altering of rules of engagement replaced with recall and
retreat
The cessation of interrogation tools that are effective but
are seen as offensive and demeaning
All because Muslims label these Islamophobic.
All of these things we have viewed as small incremental
changes, are now the result of our law enforcement agencies calling Islamic
terrorism acts of domestic extremism.
By not immediately designating killings such as San
Bernardino, Chattanooga, Fort Hood or Garland TX as Islamic terrorism, they are
falling into criminal categories rather than terrorist ones. We are becoming
desensitized to the reality of an enemy who is fighting in the name of Islam
that has an ideology that is dismantling and destroying America.
It isn’t Islamophobia that is dangerous, it is those calling for its demise who are
*This article was taken from a chapter from The Muslim Brotherhood: The Threat in our Backyard, a book written by Cathy Hinners, founder of Dailyrollcall.com
What occurred in Christchurch New Zealand, was a horrific, heinous act against humanity. The response that immediately followed, by scores of left leaning media outlets and organizations was the new trend..to harshly criticize those offering thoughts and prayers, and labeling it Islamophobia rather than what is was, murder. Murder is against the law, Islamophobia is not..yet.
The aftermath of crime is the focus of this article, not the event itself.
Crimes of every nature occur every second in America, to every type of person, regardless of their race, religion, or sexual orientation. It seems though, any crime that has happened to a Muslim, is based on Islamophobia only. Islamophobia has become a weapon used by Muslims to attempt to silence any and all types of criticism, and exposure. Islamophobia, when first coined, was meant to be a “fear of Islam”.
Since that definition didn’t have the desired impact or outcome, the term was redefined to mean Islamophobia is rooted in racism, and is caused by hatred and discrimination. Changing the meaning now encompasses more than criticism or being exposed, it means anything that occurs to a Muslim, or is negatively spoken about Islam is Islamophobia . They want you to believe Islamophobia equates with killing.
By promoting the false narrative that exposing or speaking out against Islam leads to violence, or death, Muslims are hopeful pressure by those that embrace and support them will eventually lead to laws similar to those in Middle Eastern countries.
In Egypt, Counter-terrorism and Protest laws are used as aguise to arrest those using the internet to criticize their government, but Blasphemy or apostasy laws are applicable if one dares to denounce Islam or Sharia law.
While it is difficult for many to wrap their head around Muslims believe Islam is superior and meant to dominate, just as many understand the end goal, which is the return of the global caliphate, where in fact, Islam is dominate.
With the incident occurring in New Zealand, supposedly at the hands of an anti-Muslim deranged man, Islamic groups here in America did not waste time urging Americans to fight against Islamophobia. The Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR aka Hamas) pointed to research showing a rise in anti-Muslim sentiment since President Trump was elected. CAIR National Executive Director Nihad said President Trump needs to assure Muslims that they are protected and that he will not tolerate violence against their community.
Of course, this statement is not true, since many reports of violence or harassment against Muslims have been proven to be bogus, with Muslims often committing the actual crime themselves to intentionally up the statistics on crime against Muslims. President Trump is working to protect all Americans.
Besides the false reports (this is only a few), the FBI’s statistics from 2017 shows Jews the most victimized, not Muslims.
Another group always seeking attention, is the American Muslim Advisory Council (AMAC) based in Nashville TN. Their statement regarding the New Zealand mosque shooting blamed President Trump, and the Islamophobia “200 million dollar industry”. A side note about AMAC..its current chairwoman, Zulfat Suara, a Nigerian, who just spent time in her homeland, has failed to condemn and call for the end of violence Nigerian Muslims just committed against Nigerian Christians by slaughtering them in their places of worship over the last few days.
Zulfat Suara on the left
The obvious attempt to promote the false story only Muslims are vilified and massacred just shows the intentional deceitfulness of their message. It’s a disgrace hundreds of real pious people are being killed and the media and Muslims only find their story worth time.
It’s time to see “Islamophobia” for what it is. Non-existent and a lie.
Definition of Islamophobia then: irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against Islam or people who practice Islam.
Definition of Islamophobia now: “a racial project, spawned by a master discourse that drove European supremacy and today powered by popular views and state policy seeking to safeguard its domestic progeny, white supremacy.”
Islamists are good at redefining words when their effectiveness takes a nose dive, or they need to create a new narrative. This is the case in an article written by Khaled A Beydoun, and published in Aljazeera titled “Rethinking Islamophobia”. Beydoun , a law professor at the University of Detroit Mercy School of Law,and an affiliated faculty member at UC Berkeley declares Islamophobia is “anchored in an Orientalist underbelly that precedes the creation of the formative American racial enterprise and its modern form, and a protracted War on Terror that extends it through formal law and policy.”
In this article, which is filled with paranoia more that truth, Beydoun actually does state he is redefining Islamophobia. “This historical context, coupled with its modern complexity, inspired my new definition and framing of Islamophobia. Above all, Islamophobia is founded upon the presumption that Islam is inherently violent, alien, and unassimilable – driven by the belief that expressions of Muslim identity correlate with a propensity for terrorism.”
But wait, all of that is true, and is well documented throughout the trilogy of Islam known as the Koran, Hadiths and Sunnah (SIra). Islam has been, and still is violent, alien, or I would say antiquated, and certainly does not urge the assimilation of Muslims into Western culture.The prophet Muhammad was, in his early Meccan years a peaceful, pious man, but upon his inability to convert the masses, he became a political, murderous thief.
What Muslims like Beydoun want the world to believe, is America is a racist society, that somehow has been transformed due to the election of a President that wants to make our country great again. This idea seems to be offensive to Muslims, since their ideology calls for everything that is antithetical to our way of life. Muslims believe in redistribution of wealth, that all people are unequivocally equal, and their beliefs are supreme. That is where the hypocrisy lies. In Islam, there are two classes of people..Muslims and dhimmis. Dhimmis must follow the rules of Islam, and pay a tax called jizya. If they cooperate, Dhimmis are allowed to practice their faith, and are protected by the state.
Another fantasy Beydoun has created is three dimensions of which he labels “private Islamophobia; 2- structural Islamophobia, and; 3- dialectical Islamophobia.” “Private” Islamophobia is considered the fear of Islam, perpetrated by those who mis- characterize Muslims and others like Sikhs. Structural Islamophobia comes from the government in the form of laws and bans against Muslims, and dialectical, which basically reiterates the prior two.
What Beydoun doesn’t tell in his long diatribe, is the truth. The word Islamophobia was created by Muslims to be used as a label which would deter people from speaking out against, or opposing Islam. Labels are known to harm people in the way of losing their job, family members, or friends. Like any other term though, over time it loses is meaning and effectiveness, so other definitions or words are created. Now, according to this article, Islamophobia is no longer a fear of Islam, but an entire structure of society filled with a population that is hateful, and loaded with supremacy. White supremacy. Oh please!
HOWEVER, the most important point is how the term is being used by Muslims. Their efforts to end what they consider to be Islamophobia has instead created a national security risk. Law enforcement and our military have become so delicate to Muslim communities for fear of losing federal funding or their pensions they are cooperating with Muslim communities conducting business in a way that doesn’t offend the Muslims. Because of the demands by Muslims to further their agenda and our political correctness, some of the outcomes of these implications are:
The purging of relevant, factual training that includes who terrorist organizations and their supporters are within the U.S
The termination of surveillance in mosques
The end of profiling
The ceasing of standard search procedures, such as canines to detect explosives
The barring of our military being able to identify the enemy and annihilate them
The altering of rules of engagement replaced with recall and retreat
The cessation of interrogation tools that are effective but are seen as offensive and demeaning
All because Muslims label these Islamophobic.
All of these things we have viewed as small incremental changes, are now the result of our law enforcement agencies calling Islamic terrorism acts of domestic extremism.
It isn’t Islamophobia that is dangerous, it is those calling for its demise who are.
The false headlines have started already. Islamophobia is to blame for the killing of 6 Muslims attending Isha, the last prayer of the day. However, it is slowly being revealed to the public, 2 arrests have been made, and they are believed to be Muslims. Witnesses coming forward stating the men were yelling Allah Akbar as they began to shoot.
This apparently does not come as a surprise to the Imam of the Islamic Center of Quebec, as just hours earlier he spoke of former members that considered his mosque to be blasphemous, and filled with the murtadeen, or apostates.
This isn’t new to those that understand ISIS. In Issue 14 of Dabiq magazine, several pages are dedicated to explaining why Muslims are apostates rather than hypocrites.
In a news conference just being held with Canadian law enforcement officials, reporters asking if this particular mosque had been one of interest, officials vehemently stated they would not answer the question, as to not offend its members.
Muslims following the perfect, universal Islam. The same Islam practiced here. Islam is Islam.
Stay tuned for more information as more arrests and details will be released.
Latest: Alexandre Bissonnette, a 27 yr old from Cap-Rouge, Quebec has been arrested. Bissonnette, dressed in black allegedly armed with an AK-47, opened fire at the mosque killing 6. Witnesses state he yelled allah akbar as he shot anything that moved.
