It’s about time! Muslims in America are being exposed as they reveal themselves during their speeches meant for Muslim ears only. Now the fun begins as they attempt to change what was said by accusing Islamophobes of editing, misconstruing, and misunderstanding their terms. In their continuous effort to play the word game, it only takes a look into their doctrine to see the truth.
Last week at a Muslim Brotherhood front group conference (the Islamic Society of North America..ISNA), Linda Sarour, a self proclaimed, egotistical, Muslim activist gave a keynote speech in which she declared their prophet said “jihad is a word of truth in front of a tyrant, ruler or leader. That is the best form of jihad. I hope that when we stand up to those that oppress our communities that Allah accepts from us that as a form of jihad”.
Although Muslims have defined jihad as their “struggle”, it has other meanings, which can be found throughout their Koran and the hadiths. Once again, in their own words Jihad is used to defend Islam from the non believer. From the website “Islamweb“, their stance on jihad is the following:
So yes, Jihad is technically a struggle, because Muslims must strive to convert everyone to Islam. When a Muslim speaks of oppression and tyranny, it is not what we think. Muslims in America are far from being oppressed in the sense we believe oppression to be. Oppression to a Muslim is the inability to openly demand Christians and Jews convert to Islam. Being in America, Muslims have had to say they are tolerant of other beliefs, therefore they have been oppressed.
In order to understand the word game, you must know the terms. (*Taken from Louis Palme’s “Knowing Four Arabic Words May Save Our Civilization From Islamic Takeover”)
*Taqiyya– defined as dissimulation about ones Muslim identity.The Quran says, “Let believers not make friends with infidels in preference to the faithful – he that does has nothing to hope for from Allah – except in self-defense (Sura 3:28). This “self-defense” justifies dissimulation. Islamic Sharia Law provides, “When it is possible to achieve an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible, and lying is obligatory if the goal is obligatory.” (Reliance of the Traveler, r8.2) Examples include lying to protect Islam or a Muslim.
*Tawriya is defined as concealing, and it could be called “creative lying”. It is OK to break the intent of the oath, as long as you don’t break the letter of the oath. (Reliance of the Traveler, sections O19.1 and )19.5) How does this work? Suppose someone protests that Surah 1 of the Quran demeans Christians and Jews, because it is a supplication Muslims make to Allah seventeen times a day to keep them from the path of “those with whom God is angry” and “those who have lost their way”. A Muslim might respond, “Surah 1 never mentions Jews or Christians.” He is practicing tawriya, because while Surah 1 does not mention Jews and Christians by name, but he knows full-well that the words “those” refer to Jews and Christians.
Another example would be when a Muslim responds to your greeting of “Merry Christmas!” He might say, “I wish you the best.” In your mind, you think he has returned a Christmas greeting. In actuality, he has expressed his wish for you to convert to Islam; he wishes the best for you which, in his view, is becoming a Muslim.
*Kitman
Kitman is characterized by someone telling only part of the truth. The most common example of this is when a Muslim says that jihad really refers to an internal, spiritual struggle. He is not telling “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth”, as witnesses are sworn to do in U.S. courts. Often, kitman results in a gross distortion of the truth. In the example given, the Quran uses jihad and its derivatives 59 times. Of those, only 16 (27%) could be considered “internal” with no object as the target of the struggle based on the context of the surah.
Another common form of kitman is to quote only the few peaceful passages from the Quran, knowing full-well that that passage was later abrogated by a more militant, contradictory verse. Here is an example:
“There is no compulsion in religion” (Surah 2:256) Early Medina
“Are they seeking a religion other than Allah’s, when every soul in the heavens and earth has submitted to Him, willingly or by compulsion?” (Surah 3:83 Later Medina)
Another example:
“Permission to take up arms is hereby given to those who are attacked, because they have been wronged.” (Surah 22:39) Late Mecca
“When the sacred months are over, slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them and lie in ambush everywhere for them.” (Surah 9:5) Late Medina
*Muruna
Muruna means using “flexibility” to blend in with the enemy or the surroundings. The justification for this kind of deception is a somewhat bizarre interpretation of Surah 2:106, which says, “If we abrogate a verse or cause it to be forgotten, We will replace it by a better one or similar.” Thus, Muslims may forget some of the commands in the Quran, as long as they are pursuing a better command. Muslims striving to advance Islam, therefore, can deviate from their Islamic laws in order to cause non-Muslims to lower their guard and place their trust in their Muslim counterpart.
At times, Muslims practice muruna in the same way a chameleon changes colors to avoid detection. Muslims will sometimes shave off their beards, wear western clothing, or even drink alcohol to blend in with non-Muslims. Nothing is more valuable these days to the Islamists than a blue-eyed Caucasian Muslim willing to engage in terrorism.
Another common way of using muruna is for a Muslim to marry a non-Muslim or to behave like a non-Muslim so their true agenda will not be suspected. The 9/11 hijackers visited strip clubs and bars during their off-times while taking classes in the U.S. to fly airplanes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and the White House. Many Americans believe Hillary Clinton’s aide, Huma Abedin, married Jewish Congressman Anthony Weiner at least in part to burnish her security credentials so she could infiltrate the highest levels of the Administration.
This video of the Islamic Society of North America’s conference keynote speaker, Linda Sarsour is filled with deceptive and distorted words. Listen for yourself noting the above terms.
Videos dont lie..but Muslims do.
References: The Noble Quran
Reliance of the Traveller– the classic book of Islamic law
Are you aware that this link,
http://dailyrollcall.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/sarsour-video-on-patriotism.mp4?_=1
returns an error message – Media error: Format(s) not supported or source(s) not found?
If you can, please update the link. I really want to see that video!